Now I had something to aim at, but it would be fully four years before I got into a car capable of pulling it off. Pleasingly, it was the Testarossa’s replacement, the radically improved 512 TR. It had a little more power, 428PS (315kW) if memory serves, but was reputed to be better still in the suspension, tyres and aerodynamic departments. It would need to be.
And so to the attempt itself. Your big fear at those speeds on banking is tyre failure. By making it corner as hard as it can while hurtling around a bank so steep you’d need a rope ladder to climb it, you are subjecting the nearside tyres to sustained loads they were never designed to take. And an explosive deflation at over 170mph on a steeply banked track with just a thin layer of Armco between you and oblivion barely bore thinking about. For safety gear, I put my seatbelt on over my jeans and T-shirt. By my side was a cub road tester, armed with a stopwatch and nothing else. There were no independent witnesses and no GPS. We had proper timing equipment of course, but the huge sensor would have to be suckered to the side of the car where it would ruin the aero if, of course, it stayed attached which was far from a given. So a stop watch, triggered every half mile around a two mile lap, it was.
Mindful of the fact that the more time we spent on the track, the more likely a tyre would go, we timed the first flying lap the car completed. As Howard had reported, top speed was limited not by what was under your right foot, but by the driver’s ability to physically hold the car on the banking. But 512 TR was, if not exactly easy, then at least consistent and therefore predictable. It was hard work for sure but the truth is I’d been more scared on the banking in a TVR at 140mph than I was on the far side of 170mph in the Ferrari. All that time spent on the chassis and aero had worked.